Thursday, July 19, 2012

2012 TOP 10 RECORDS SO FAR

When I sat down to write this post yesterday, I was ready to straight blast on Frank Ocean's channel Orange. I was going to say how much less interesting it is than his 2011 mixtape, Nostalgia, that he sounds like Musiq with less soul, and that after the Weeknd's murderous 2011 mixtapes, everything else "new" in R&B just sounds like "old" R&B. I was going to say that, as if by a deliberate formula aimed at mediocrity, great beats were always paired with weak choruses, and vice versa. I was going to conclude with the admission that I have eaten crow on album review before (808s and Heartbreak; Watch the Throne), and that I would give this one a few more listens before I really made up my mind.

What can I say? I'm glad I didn't write that bullshit!

Just the same, even though channel Orange is more than OK in my book now, I'm going to continue with the plan of sharing my favorite new records of the year so far. If, for whatever reason, you want to hear anything other than channel Orange sometime soon, go with one of these.

Favorite Albums of 2012 (So Far) (Yes, in order):

Chromatics - Kill for Love

Turned on this record at the beginning of the year. The streets have never looked the same.
Fiona Apple - The Idler Wheel Is Wiser Than the Driver of the Screw and Whipping Cords Will Serve You More Than Ropes Will Ever Do

 channel Orange's P4k reviewer said that Frank Ocean is one of the best singer-songwriters working today. If you want to believe that, don't listen to a Fiona Apple album.
fun. - Some Nights

I hate saying that I liked this band before they were famous. But. I did.









Beach House - Bloom
Passion Pit - Gossamer
Theophilus London - Timez Are Weird These Days
Baroness - Green & Yellow (for when you want to hear the exact, constitutional opposite of Frank Ocean)
JJ - High Summer (EP)
Japandroids - Celebration Rock
Mount Eerie - Clear Moon

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

July 18, 2012

If you've got a few bucks, condition (1) is treatable.


1. Sobriety
2. Hunger
3. Arousal
4. Satisfaction
5. Fatigue


As a writer, you experience many physical conditions that adversely impact your productivity: the loathsome among them is Sobriety. Hunger comes in second, dispelling the romance of the starving artist. If you have tried it, you will have noted that it is better not to have Hunger. Third place belongs to Arousal which, while not unpleasant, is fully distracting (you want to want it) and can only be resolved by measures that lead directly to the fourth and fifth conditions, Satisfaction and Fatigue. Nothing is so devastating to the creative drive as Satisfaction. Fortunately for art, Satisfaction is still very rare and fleeting and misplaced. Fatigue, on the other hand, appears in a sort of harmless abundance. Until you literally fall asleep drooling into your keyboard, Fatigue poses no real threat. Hide the clock in your taskbar, drink another cup of coffee, stop doing the arithmetic on the hours you could still sleep if you go to bed right now, and Fatigue might slow your progress by a factor less than a runny nose. Depending on the nature of your work, you may even find that writing becomes easier with someproximity to dream space.

Your mileage may vary.


TUNES TONIGHT:


Thursday, July 12, 2012

MANY OPERATIONS OF THE ETHICAL MIND

NOTE: These are just a few thematically proximal things I've been thinking about today. I call them "operations" precisely because I still work through the thought processes, here. My mind is not made up about any of this. I welcome input.



Rape Jokes

Of course, I would spend my last waking hour last night defending Daniel Tosh on the internet. It was the only reasonable conclusion to a day I began waking at sunrise in the grass outside my apartment building—a day that was never going to make a lot of sense. Tosh, I read, had recently prompted a morass of outrage during some stand-up at the Laugh Factory wherein he tells the audience that rape jokes are always funny. A woman in the audience pointed out the obvious: they are, in fact, not. As a comedian on stage with his sense of humor stepped-on before the whole audience, there are probably very few ways he could have responded to her. As it turns out, “Wouldn’t it be funny if that girl got raped by like, 5 guys right now?” was not one of them. OK, even in the context of comedy, where envelopes are supposed to be pushed and people are supposed to be offended pretty often, this is still the fuckest uppest thing to say.

So, I mislead you earlier when I said that I spent that last hour defending Daniel Tosh. I don’t care if you hate him, love him, or masturbate screaming his name. The story itself isn’t all that interesting to me. What interests me a great deal is the character response, beginning with this oneshared by a friend on Facebook.   



I replied: I'm not sure how solid this argument is. The idea that rape jokes are not like regular jokes because they "turn a traumatic experience into something people laugh at," makes them sound EXACTLY like a regular joke. I mean, over the years, I've heard jokes about slavery, murder, third world dictatorships, and pretty much everything else. Sometimes I laughed, sometimes I gagged, sometimes I rolled my eyes and muttered "white-privileged, cisgender asshole" at the tv. But I never wished for an entire topic to be taken off the table. Humor would suck if it was allowed to make a few mistakes.

Just to clarify, my counter-argument had two parts. The first was that the argument provided for why rape jokes were never OK was not a strong one because it depends on the claim rape jokes are inherently different from other jokes, but it fails to demonstrate so effectively. There has to be some trait about the topic of rape that separates it from all of the other awful shit we joke about for anyone to expect us to treat it differently. Identifying that trait is essential making and understanding the argument.

The second part was broadly about humor itself and whether any topic, no matter how offensive, should ever be beyond consideration. Even when it is harmful for society as a whole, I have reasons why I want art to be insulated from this level of criticism. I’m not sure if that’s a conversation I’m ready to have right now, but whatever. Let’s try.

-----

 Contrarian Ex-Vegetarian

I eat meat again. It had been six years. When I am asked why, I say, “I think it’s important to periodically reexamine your life choices.” No one seems to mind that this is not an answer, least of all me.

So, why was I ever a vegetarian in the first place? Well, it goes back to a trip I took with Heather in the spring of 2006. I took her to New York, then to visit my family in Texas; altogether, we were gone about a 5 days, I think. It was during that trip that I really noticed how difficult it could be for Heather, a vegetarian already, to find decent food in unfamiliar environments (keep in mind that this is before anyone had Google Maps on our phones). Often she could only eat the sides at restaurants. A few times she would order menu items appeared to be meatless only to discover some questionable, unlisted ingredient or sauce and have to scrap the whole thing. 

That was just New York. Texas was worse.

My life privilege thus exposed, I became a vegetarian as an act of protest—protest of the unfair treatment of vegetarians—or, as Chelsea would later term it, a “contrarian vegetarian.” Over time, a basic ethics evolved. To my carnivore friends, the ones who thought I was crazy, who asserted our right to eat animals by sovereignty of nature, I could say essentially this: if we can now thrive in life without destroying other living things, do we not have a moral obligation to try?

This put me in a bit of an ethical pickle now, doesn’t it? How do I reconcile the disparity between what  I still feel is a very good ethical stance and the actions I take now without feeling particularly bad? Well… I haven’t so much as reconciled it as I have put it away. When I think of my previous ethic, I recall that it came from a perspective that every action in life should be consistently, philosophically grounded. I don’t exactly believe that anymore or, at least, I don’t think “philosophy,” itself, is merely what I once believed.

Of course, some common ethical concerns could sneak through this very big loophole. This, then, is how I could justify spending money on beer instead of giving it to the needy. Strange perversities sneak through as well: there are large parts of my body I would now like to grill and eat.

Am I kidding?

-----

The Ethics of Ethics
 
I wonder at the end of the day if I have been ethical enough. Have I acted with appropriate responsibility for myself and society? Have I done enough for my fellow man to consider myself one of the good ones—not just enough to compare myself to others, but to live up to an anonymous, higher standard?

Have I been feminist enough today? Was it antifeminist to criticize a feminist stance, to defend misogynistic themes in comedy because of some weaknesses in the arguments against? Or did I do right by feminism by demanding a higher level of rigor from an argument that could have otherwise skated by on presupposed agreement? 

This is how I feel right now writing this: haughty, guilty and exposed. I don’t like rape jokes one bit; it would be easier for me to believe that they should never exist. It is possible that a stronger argument would make me believe it, but right now, I just don’t. That sucks.

So, what do I tell myself at the end of the day? I tell myself that the only truly ethical stance is to keep wondering, to never feel that you’ve done enough. And in the meantime, try not to do harm, and can still recognize yourself from your enemies. I think, for now, that should be enough.


TUNES TONIGHT: 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DYWwqYl0yA&feature=related